![]() |
BootsnAll's Daily Travel Fix |
|
Categories
Recent Entries
* Three billion tourist dollars at risk due to tsunami
* Goldman Sachs flirts with Japan's love hotels * Residents' fury over backpacker hostel plan * One killed, 34 injured in 85- to 90-vehicle crash near Grand Rapids * Flying faulty jumbo across Atlantic saves BA £100,000 * One Air Traveler, Two Airfares? * Gap students 'learn little' about world * The new travel discounts * Jet Flies On With One Engine Out * BA enlists Darling's help over cost of flight turned back by US * Cutbacks squeeze airline workers * Southwest offers exclusive, cheaper fares * Students plan crime spree * NW Airlink pilots "having fun" before crash * Is London the new Japan? * Even the Vikings were troubled by the thought that size matters * United Airlines' net loss is $326 million for January * Uli Derickson, 60, Who Helped Airline Hostages, Dies * No way to run a RR * 'Loch Ness' eel frightens tourist Sponsored Links
Archives
|
March 06, 2005Flying faulty jumbo across Atlantic saves BA £100,000
By Ben Webster Turning back after engine failure would have left airline liable to pay out for delays under new rules on compensation A BRITISH AIRWAYS jumbo jet carrying 351 passengers was forced to make an emergency landing after an 11-hour transatlantic flight with a failed engine. The fault occurred on take-off from Los Angeles but the pilot declined all opportunities to land in the US and instead continued on three engines for 5,000 miles to Britain. The incident happened three days after a European regulation came into force requiring airlines to compensate passengers for long delays or cancellations. Under the new rules, if the pilot had returned to Los Angeles, BA would have been facing a compensation bill of more than £100,000.
Comments
Yikes! That's terribly nerve racking...I'd be very angry if I was on that plane. Posted by: court on March 10, 2005 11:03 AMPost a comment
|
Resources
Email this page
|